#145 [Rights-Module] documented the role system and some renaming
This commit is contained in:
@@ -65,23 +65,23 @@ public class UserRoleAssignmentServiceUnitTest {
|
||||
Arrays.asList(
|
||||
new UserRoleAssignment().entityTypeId("test.SomethingElse")
|
||||
.entityObjectId(givenEntityObjectId)
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT),
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT),
|
||||
new UserRoleAssignment().entityTypeId(givenEntityTypeId)
|
||||
.entityObjectId(givenEntityObjectId)
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT),
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT),
|
||||
new UserRoleAssignment().entityTypeId(givenEntityTypeId)
|
||||
.entityObjectId(givenEntityObjectId)
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT),
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT),
|
||||
new UserRoleAssignment().entityTypeId(givenEntityTypeId)
|
||||
.entityObjectId(3L)
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)));
|
||||
.assignedRole(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)));
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
final Set<Role> actual = userRoleAssignmentService
|
||||
.getEffectiveRoleOfCurrentUser(givenEntityTypeId, givenEntityObjectId);
|
||||
|
||||
// then
|
||||
assertThat(actual).containsExactlyInAnyOrder(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
assertThat(actual).containsExactlyInAnyOrder(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ public class JSonAccessFilterTestFixture {
|
||||
Long id;
|
||||
|
||||
@ParentId(resolver = GivenCustomerService.class)
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER, update = ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER, read = ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = ANY_CUSTOMER_USER, update = ANY_CUSTOMER_USER, read = ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
Long customerId;
|
||||
|
||||
@AccessFor(
|
||||
init = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT },
|
||||
update = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT },
|
||||
read = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT })
|
||||
init = { CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT, CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT },
|
||||
update = { CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT, CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT },
|
||||
read = { CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT, CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT })
|
||||
String restrictedField;
|
||||
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = ANYBODY, update = ANYBODY, read = ANYBODY)
|
||||
@@ -133,11 +133,18 @@ public class JSonAccessFilterTestFixture {
|
||||
@AccessFor(read = Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
Long id;
|
||||
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, update = Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, read = ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
@AccessFor(
|
||||
init = Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT,
|
||||
update = Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT,
|
||||
read = ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
@ParentId(resolver = GivenService.class)
|
||||
Long parentId;
|
||||
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT }, update = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT })
|
||||
@AccessFor(
|
||||
init = { CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT, CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT },
|
||||
update = {
|
||||
CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT,
|
||||
CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT })
|
||||
String restrictedField;
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
@@ -204,11 +211,18 @@ public class JSonAccessFilterTestFixture {
|
||||
@AccessFor(read = Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
Long id;
|
||||
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, update = Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, read = ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
@AccessFor(
|
||||
init = Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT,
|
||||
update = Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT,
|
||||
read = ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)
|
||||
@ParentId(resolver = GivenParentService.class)
|
||||
GivenParent parent;
|
||||
|
||||
@AccessFor(init = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT }, update = { TECHNICAL_CONTACT, FINANCIAL_CONTACT })
|
||||
@AccessFor(
|
||||
init = { CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT, CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT },
|
||||
update = {
|
||||
CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT,
|
||||
CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT })
|
||||
String restrictedField;
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ public class JSonDeserializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void init() {
|
||||
securityContext = SecurityContextMock.usingMock(userRoleAssignmentService)
|
||||
.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(GivenDto.class, 1234L, Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER);
|
||||
.withRole(GivenDto.class, 1234L, Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER);
|
||||
|
||||
given(ctx.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory()).willReturn(autowireCapableBeanFactory);
|
||||
given(autowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(GivenService.class)).willReturn(givenService);
|
||||
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ public class JSonDeserializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void shouldDeserializeStringFieldIfRequiredRoleIsCoveredByUser() throws IOException {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
givenJSonTree(
|
||||
asJSon(
|
||||
ImmutablePair.of("id", 1234L),
|
||||
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ public class JSonDeserializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void shouldDeserializeUnchangedStringFieldIfRequiredRoleIsNotCoveredByUser() throws IOException {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
givenJSonTree(
|
||||
asJSon(
|
||||
ImmutablePair.of("id", 1234L),
|
||||
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ public class JSonDeserializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void shouldNotCreateIfRoleRequiredByParentEntityIsNotCoveredByUser() throws IOException {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 9999L, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 9999L, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
givenJSonTree(
|
||||
asJSon(
|
||||
ImmutablePair.of("parentId", 1234L)));
|
||||
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ public class JSonDeserializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void shouldCreateIfRoleRequiredByReferencedEntityIsCoveredByUser() throws IOException {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
.withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
givenJSonTree(
|
||||
asJSon(
|
||||
ImmutablePair.of("parentId", 1234L)));
|
||||
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ public class JSonDeserializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void shouldResolveParentIdFromIdOfSerializedSubEntity() throws IOException {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(GivenParent.class, 1234L, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
.withRole(GivenParent.class, 1234L, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
givenJSonTree(
|
||||
asJSon(
|
||||
ImmutablePair.of(
|
||||
|
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ public class JSonSerializationWithAccessFilterUnitTest {
|
||||
public void shouldSerializeRestrictedFieldIfRequiredRoleIsCoveredByUser() throws IOException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(GivenCustomerDto.class, 888L, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
serialize(givenDTO);
|
||||
|
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ public class RoleUnitTest {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ADMIN.covers(Role.ADMIN)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.SUPPORTER.covers(Role.SUPPORTER)).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER))).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER))).isTrue();
|
||||
@@ -35,22 +35,22 @@ public class RoleUnitTest {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.SUPPORTER.covers(Role.ADMIN)).isFalse();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT.covers(Role.SUPPORTER)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT.covers(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT))).isFalse();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANYBODY.covers((Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER))).isFalse();
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -62,18 +62,20 @@ public class RoleUnitTest {
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.SUPPORTER.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER))).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.covers((Role.ANYBODY))).isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void financialContactShouldNotCoverAnyCustomersUsersRoleRequirement() {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER)).isFalse();
|
||||
public void financialContactShouldNotCoverAnyOtherRealRoleRequirement() {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ACTUAL_CUSTOMER_USER)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.covers(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)).isFalse();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@@ -87,11 +89,16 @@ public class RoleUnitTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void coversAny() {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.HOSTMASTER.coversAny(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.coversAny(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT.coversAny(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.HOSTMASTER.coversAny(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.coversAny(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT))
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT.coversAny(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT))
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.coversAny(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT)).isFalse();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER.coversAny(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT))
|
||||
.isFalse();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(catchThrowable(() -> Role.HOSTMASTER.coversAny())).isInstanceOf(VerifyException.class);
|
||||
assertThat(catchThrowable(() -> Role.HOSTMASTER.coversAny((Role[]) null))).isInstanceOf(VerifyException.class);
|
||||
@@ -122,15 +129,16 @@ public class RoleUnitTest {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.HOSTMASTER.getAuthority()).hasValue(AuthoritiesConstants.HOSTMASTER);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ADMIN.getAuthority()).hasValue(AuthoritiesConstants.ADMIN);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.SUPPORTER.getAuthority()).hasValue(AuthoritiesConstants.SUPPORTER);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.getAuthority()).isEmpty();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT.getAuthority()).isEmpty();
|
||||
assertThat(Role.ANYBODY.getAuthority()).hasValue(AuthoritiesConstants.ANONYMOUS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void isBroadest() {
|
||||
assertThat(Role.broadest(Role.HOSTMASTER, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isEqualTo(Role.HOSTMASTER);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.broadest(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.HOSTMASTER)).isEqualTo(Role.HOSTMASTER);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.broadest(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER)).isEqualTo(Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.broadest(Role.HOSTMASTER, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT)).isEqualTo(Role.HOSTMASTER);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.broadest(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.HOSTMASTER)).isEqualTo(Role.HOSTMASTER);
|
||||
assertThat(Role.broadest(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT, Role.ANY_CUSTOMER_USER))
|
||||
.isEqualTo(Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ public class AssetDTOIntTest {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
|
||||
final AssetDTO given = createSomeAssetDTO(SOME_ASSET_ID);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ public class AssetDTOIntTest {
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldNotDeserializeForContractualCustomerContact() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final String json = new JSonBuilder()
|
||||
.withFieldValue("id", SOME_ASSET_ID)
|
||||
.withFieldValue("remark", "Updated Remark")
|
||||
@@ -172,7 +173,7 @@ public class AssetDTOIntTest {
|
||||
BadRequestAlertException.class,
|
||||
bre -> assertThat(bre.getMessage())
|
||||
.isEqualTo(
|
||||
"Update of field AssetDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
"Update of field AssetDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ public class AssetDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<AssetDTO> {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveProperAccessForContractualContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
initAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
"membershipId",
|
||||
"documentDate",
|
||||
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ public class AssetDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<AssetDTO> {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveNoAccessForTechnicalContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
initAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(AssetDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ public class CustomerDTOUnitTest {
|
||||
public void testSerializationAsContractualCustomerContact() throws JsonProcessingException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, 1234L, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, 1234L, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
CustomerDTO given = createSomeCustomerDTO(1234L);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ public class CustomerDTOUnitTest {
|
||||
public void testSerializationAsTechnicalCustomerUser() throws JsonProcessingException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, 1234L, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, 1234L, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
CustomerDTO given = createSomeCustomerDTO(1234L);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ public class CustomerDTOUnitTest {
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testDeserializeAsContractualCustomerContact() throws IOException {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, 1234L, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, 1234L, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
given(customerRepository.findById(1234L)).willReturn(Optional.of(new Customer().id(1234L)));
|
||||
String json = "{\"id\":1234,\"contractualSalutation\":\"Hallo Updated\",\"billingSalutation\":\"Moin Updated\"}";
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ public class MembershipDTOIntTest {
|
||||
public void shouldSerializePartiallyForFinancialCustomerContact() throws JsonProcessingException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final MembershipDTO given = createSampleDTO(SOME_SEPA_MANDATE_ID, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
@@ -139,7 +140,8 @@ public class MembershipDTOIntTest {
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldNotDeserializeForContractualCustomerContact() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final String json = new JSonBuilder()
|
||||
.withFieldValue("id", SOME_SEPA_MANDATE_ID)
|
||||
.withFieldValue("remark", "Updated Remark")
|
||||
@@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ public class MembershipDTOIntTest {
|
||||
assertThat(actual).isInstanceOfSatisfying(
|
||||
BadRequestAlertException.class,
|
||||
bre -> assertThat(bre.getMessage()).isEqualTo(
|
||||
"Update of field MembershipDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
"Update of field MembershipDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ public class MembershipDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<Membership
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveProperAccessForContractualContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
initAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
"admissionDocumentDate",
|
||||
"cancellationDocumentDate",
|
||||
@@ -56,9 +56,9 @@ public class MembershipDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<Membership
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveNoAccessForTechnicalContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
initAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(MembershipDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ public class SepaMandateDTOIntTest {
|
||||
public void shouldSerializePartiallyForFinancialCustomerContact() throws JsonProcessingException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final SepaMandateDTO given = createSampleDTO(SOME_SEPA_MANDATE_ID, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
@@ -144,7 +145,8 @@ public class SepaMandateDTOIntTest {
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldNotDeserializeForContractualCustomerContact() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final String json = new JSonBuilder()
|
||||
.withFieldValue("id", SOME_SEPA_MANDATE_ID)
|
||||
.withFieldValue("remark", "Updated Remark")
|
||||
@@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ public class SepaMandateDTOIntTest {
|
||||
assertThat(actual).isInstanceOfSatisfying(
|
||||
BadRequestAlertException.class,
|
||||
bre -> assertThat(bre.getMessage()).isEqualTo(
|
||||
"Update of field SepaMandateDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
"Update of field SepaMandateDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ public class SepaMandateDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<SepaManda
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveProperAccessForContractualContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
initAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
"grantingDocumentDate",
|
||||
"bic",
|
||||
"validUntilDate",
|
||||
@@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ public class SepaMandateDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<SepaManda
|
||||
"validFromDate",
|
||||
"iban",
|
||||
"reference");
|
||||
updateAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
updateAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
"validUntilDate",
|
||||
"revokationDocumentDate");
|
||||
readAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
readAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
"grantingDocumentDate",
|
||||
"bic",
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ public class SepaMandateDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<SepaManda
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveNoAccessForTechnicalContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
initAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(SepaMandateDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ public class ShareDTOIntTest {
|
||||
public void shouldSerializePartiallyForFinancialCustomerContact() throws JsonProcessingException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_FINANCIAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final ShareDTO given = createSomeShareDTO(SOME_SHARE_ID);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
@@ -156,7 +157,8 @@ public class ShareDTOIntTest {
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldNotDeserializeForContractualCustomerContact() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser()
|
||||
.withRole(CustomerDTO.class, SOME_CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
final String json = new JSonBuilder()
|
||||
.withFieldValue("id", SOME_SHARE_ID)
|
||||
.withFieldValue("remark", "Updated Remark")
|
||||
@@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ public class ShareDTOIntTest {
|
||||
BadRequestAlertException.class,
|
||||
bre -> assertThat(bre.getMessage())
|
||||
.isEqualTo(
|
||||
"Update of field ShareDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
"Update of field ShareDTO.remark prohibited for current user role(s): CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ public class ShareDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<ShareDTO> {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveProperAccessForContractualContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
initAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT).shouldBeExactlyFor(
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
"membershipId",
|
||||
"documentDate",
|
||||
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ public class ShareDTOUnitTest extends AccessMappingsUnitTestBase<ShareDTO> {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveNoAccessForTechnicalContact() {
|
||||
initAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
initAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
updateAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
readAccessFor(ShareDTO.class, Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT).shouldBeForNothing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ public class UserRoleAssignmentUnitTest {
|
||||
public void testSerializationAsContractualCustomerContact() throws JsonProcessingException {
|
||||
|
||||
// given
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
securityContext.havingAuthenticatedUser().withRole(CustomerDTO.class, CUSTOMER_ID, Role.CUSTOMER_CONTRACTUAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
UserRoleAssignment given = createSomeUserRoleAssignment(USER_ROLE_ASSIGNMENT_ID);
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ public class UserRoleAssignmentUnitTest {
|
||||
"user",
|
||||
JSonBuilder.asJSon(
|
||||
of("id", USER_ID))),
|
||||
of("assignedRole", Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT.name()));
|
||||
of("assignedRole", Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT.name()));
|
||||
|
||||
// when
|
||||
UserRoleAssignment actual = objectMapper.readValue(json, UserRoleAssignment.class);
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ public class UserRoleAssignmentUnitTest {
|
||||
expected.setId(USER_ROLE_ASSIGNMENT_ID);
|
||||
expected.setEntityTypeId(Customer.ENTITY_TYPE_ID);
|
||||
expected.setEntityObjectId(CUSTOMER_ID);
|
||||
expected.setAssignedRole(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
expected.setAssignedRole(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
expected.setUser(expectedUser);
|
||||
assertThat(actual).isEqualToComparingFieldByField(expected);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ public class UserRoleAssignmentUnitTest {
|
||||
given.setEntityTypeId(Customer.ENTITY_TYPE_ID);
|
||||
given.setEntityObjectId(CUSTOMER_ID);
|
||||
given.setUser(new User().id(USER_ID));
|
||||
given.setAssignedRole(Role.TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
given.setAssignedRole(Role.CUSTOMER_TECHNICAL_CONTACT);
|
||||
return given;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user